Revised “raw” data. An oxymoron?
USHCN (United States Historical Climate Network)
Wisconsin raw temperature data alterations
July 2009 data download vs January 2010 download from data.giss.nasa.gov
Here are some interesting graphics showing how RAW data evolve over time.
http://www.rockyhigh66.org/stuff/USHCN_revisions_wisconsin.htm
Hmmm!
Note how the more recent Jan 2010 version of the supposedly RAW database has often adjusted the historic data shown in the July 2009 version DOWNWARD and the more recent data UPWARDS to create an upward trend WHERE NONE ACTUALLY EXISTS.
Clever these climate "scientists", eh?
Some of the raw data are clearly more cooked than others.
Courtesy of Mike McMillan on Chiefio here
http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2010/01/15/....induced-warmth/
USHCN (United States Historical Climate Network)
Wisconsin raw temperature data alterations
July 2009 data download vs January 2010 download from data.giss.nasa.gov
Here are some interesting graphics showing how RAW data evolve over time.
http://www.rockyhigh66.org/stuff/USHCN_revisions_wisconsin.htm
Hmmm!
Note how the more recent Jan 2010 version of the supposedly RAW database has often adjusted the historic data shown in the July 2009 version DOWNWARD and the more recent data UPWARDS to create an upward trend WHERE NONE ACTUALLY EXISTS.
Clever these climate "scientists", eh?
Some of the raw data are clearly more cooked than others.
Courtesy of Mike McMillan on Chiefio here
http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2010/01/15/....induced-warmth/
![[image]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_sZRf5lYb-XeF2d5BOM_NWVHWKE3LnuHS1CY9nJAR-RJ2sjt3kYNg1v0k5CavpwsMkcYwAuXjuZpodKrNzRHvt5TK1ZO6SBgpAj1S32cOQo6Zcyxtpc0MaB_aKxhqMqGw=s0-d "[image]")
No comments:
Post a Comment